References

Cohen, J.E. and Lemley, M.A. (2001) Patent scope and innovation in the software industry. California Law Review 89, p. 1.

Deustcher Bundestag, Drucksache (2003) Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Umsetzung der Richlinie uber den rechtlichen Schutz biotechnologischer Erfindungen, 15/1709, 15 October.

Eisenberg, R.S. (1989) Patents and the progress of science: exclusive rights and experimental use. University of Chicago Law Review 56, 1017.

Finer, J.J., Finer, K.R. and Ponappa, T. (1999) Particle bombardment mediated transformation. In: Hammond, J., McGarvey, P. and Yusibov, V. (eds) Plant Biotechnology:

New Products and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, p. 59.

Fitzgerald, A. (2003) Scientists free others to transform corn. Des Moines Register, 9 March 2003, M1.

Frame, B.R., Shou, H.X., Chikwamba, R.K. et al. (2002) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of maize embryos using a standard binary vector system. Plant Physiology 13, 129.

Hantman, R.D. (1985) Experimental use as an exception to patent infringement. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 67, 617.

Janis, M.D. (2000) On courts herding cats: contending with the 'written description'

requirement (and other unruly patent disclosure doctrines). Washington University Journal of Law and Public Policy 2, 55.

Janis, M.D. (2001) Sustainable agriculture, patent rights, and plant innovation. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 9, 91.

Kaplow, L. (1992) Rules versus standards: an economic analysis. Duke Law Journal 42, 557.

Karp, J.P. (1991) Experimental use as patent infringement: the impropriety of a broad exception. Yale Law Journal 100, 2169.

Lee, E. (2002) Rules and standards for cyberspace. Notre Dame Law Review 77, 1275.

Mueller, J.M. (2001) No 'Dilettante Affair': rethinking the experimental use exception to patent infringement for biomedical research tools. University of Washington Law Review 76, 1.

O'Rourke, M. (2000) Toward a fair use doctrine in patent law. Columbia Law Review 100, 1177.

Pila, J. (2003) Bound futures: patent law and modern biotechnology. Boston University

Journal of Science and Technology Law 9(72), 326, 351.

Rai, A.K. (1999) Regulating scientific research: intellectual property rights and the norms of science. Northwestern University Law Review 94, 77.

Strandburg, K.J. (2004) What does the public get? Experimental use and the patent bargain. Wisconsin Law Review 81.

Sunstein, C.R. (1995) Problems with rules. California Law Review 83, 953.

Todaro, J.C. (1994) Enablement in biotechnology cases after in re Goodman. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal 5, 1.

UtilityExamination Guidelines (2001) 66 Federal Register 1092, January.

Zohrabian, A., Traxler, G., Caudill, S. and Smale, M. (2003) Valuing pre-commercial genetic resources: a maximum entropy approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85, 429.

0 0

Post a comment